1. Right Answer: B
Explanation: If input procedures allow overrides of data validation and editing, automatic logging should occur. A management individual who did not initiate the override should review this log. An IS auditor should not assume that compensating controls exist. As long as the overrides are policy- compliant, there is no need for senior management approval or a blanket prohibition.
2. Right Answer: B
Explanation: An integrated test facility (ITF) creates a fictitious file in the database, allowing for test transactions to be processed simultaneously with live data. While this ensures that periodic testing does not require a separate test process, there is a need to isolate test data from production data. An IS auditor is not required to use production data or a test data generator. Production master files should not be updated with test data.
3. Right Answer: A
Explanation: Choice A would prevent or detect the use of an unauthorized interest rate. Choice B informs the manager after the fact that a change was made, thereby making it possible for transactions to use an unauthorized rate prior to management review. Choices C and D do not prevent the clerk from entering an unauthorized rate change.
4. Right Answer: C
Explanation: Web services facilitate the exchange of information between two systems, regardless of the operating system or programming language used. Communication is not necessarily securer or faster, and there is no documentation benefit in using web services.
5. Right Answer: C
Explanation: Experience has demonstrated that reliance purely on preventative controls is dangerous. Preventative controls may not prove to be as strong as anticipated or their effectiveness can deteriorate over time. Evaluating the cost of controls versus the quantum of risk is a valid management concern. However, in a high-risk system a comprehensive control framework is needed, intelligent design should permit additional detective and corrective controls to be established that don't have high ongoing costs, e.g., automated interrogation of logs to highlight suspicious individual transactions or data patterns. Effective access controls are, in themselves, a positive but, for reasons outlined above, may not sufficiently compensate for other control weaknesses. In this situation the IS auditor needs to be proactive. The IS auditor has a fundamental obligation to point out control weaknesses that give rise to unacceptable risks to the organization and work with management to have these corrected. Reviewing background checks on accounts payable staff does not provide evidence that fraud will not occur.
Leave a comment